Billing ↔ Product access
Compare billing and entitlement snapshots. Flag missing access, inconsistent plans and ambiguous time windows.
Your billing works.
Does your product agree?
Find inconsistencies between what your customers used, what your systems recorded, and what you billed — with evidence you can inspect. Start with synthetic data, without an account.
✓ No API keys✓ No data uploads to a server✓ Read-only diagnostics✓ No account required
Evidence, not guesswork
See exactly where the records diverge.
The beta compares separate records and returns reproducible findings with their supporting input data. Each result tells you what to check before taking action.
It does not issue refunds, update credit balances or change customer access. It does not certify financial losses.
Try with an example →4Example findings
3Usage events
2Invoices
Duplicate metering eventReview
Accepted but unmeteredReview
Invoice amount mismatchReview
Illustration using synthetic data. No recovered revenue is asserted.
Two audits, one independent perspective.
Usage → Metering → Invoice
Compare source consumption, ingestion acknowledgments, metering records and simplified invoice amounts. Distinguish pending events from older missing events.
Small enough to trust. Clear about limits.
Deterministic checks
Input records and explicit rules, not AI guesses, determine findings.
Traceable evidence
Each issue includes source records and suggested review steps.
Portable results
Download JSON evidence; the CSV access audit also exports CSV and printable HTML.
Continuous assurance is the direction.
The roadmap includes secure read-only integrations, credit grant reconciliation, richer pricing policies and scheduled monitoring. The public beta does not currently connect to Stripe, authenticate data provenance or execute financial corrections.
Diagnostic beta — not a production billing control